From owner-cvs-all Fri Nov 12 10:23: 5 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ACA2150B0; Fri, 12 Nov 1999 10:22:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2BF5B1C4D; Fri, 12 Nov 1999 12:24:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CB63836; Fri, 12 Nov 1999 12:24:35 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 12:24:35 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fumerola To: Peter Wemm Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/stdlib malloc.3 In-Reply-To: <19991112172941.D6C711C6D@overcee.netplex.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Sat, 13 Nov 1999, Peter Wemm wrote: > > Unlike OpenBSD, which does. Ewww. > > Not according to what I see on their cvsweb for malloc.[c3]. They zero > calloc() (as do we), but not malloc(). They recently had a change to > have calloc() not also zero the result from malloc() if malloc was already > in zero mode, but it isn't by default according to the source.. Now, if they > set the malloc options some other way by default then that's silly. That must be the change I'm thinking of. -- - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message