From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 10 06:41:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ABEB16A4B3 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 06:41:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kcmso1.proxy.att.com (kcmso1.att.com [192.128.133.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469AB43FA3 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 06:41:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jwb@homer.att.com) Received: from ulysses.homer.att.com ([135.205.193.8])h9ADfLTK020541 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 08:41:21 -0500 Received: from akiva.homer.att.com (akiva.homer.att.com [135.205.212.39]) by ulysses.homer.att.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA04106 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 09:40:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from akiva.homer.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by akiva.homer.att.com (8.11.7+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h9ADeWS05996 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 09:40:32 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200310101340.h9ADeWS05996@akiva.homer.att.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 09/23/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 09:40:32 -0400 From: "J. W. Ballantine" Subject: gnome 2.4 and gs X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:41:23 -0000 Hi, When I try and build gnome 2.4, it says it depends on ggv, which depends on gs, which depends on eplaser-3.1.1-705.tgz. Make trys to get it from www.epkowa2.on.arena.ne.jp, and times out, and then trys ftp.FreeBSD, and can't fetch, and quits. When I google search on eplaser-3.1.1-705.tgz the only place it finds it is: people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/print.html and that is just a reference to it. (File: eplaser-3.1.1-705.tgz has 1 possible URL: OK!) I DL'ed the mc_ports tar ball at 7:30EST this AM and I'm using ctm to keep upto date with the ports file, current today upto 4948. Any ideas on where this problem is, and who it should be forwarded to?? thanks Jim