From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 9 12:16:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cage.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17BB537B405 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 12:16:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chimp.sentex.net (fcage [192.168.0.2]) by cage.simianscience.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f89JGH911106; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 15:16:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010909151459.05f17230@192.168.0.12> X-Sender: mdtancsa@192.168.0.12 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2001 15:16:15 -0400 To: "Kenneth Mays" , stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: 4.4RC4 + traceroute v1.3.2 (bug) In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 11:24 AM 9/9/2001 -0400, Kenneth Mays wrote: >I seem to have a bug with traceroute. I tested traceroute using networks >using VLANs/VPNs. Strange thing happens. The Microsoft tracert seems to >work fine all the time. The generic UNIX traceroute v1.4a12 which I have >compiled on FreeBSD v4.3R and 4.4RC4 works consistent to the Microsoft >tracert program. The MS tracert uses icmp echo packets, not UDP packets, so they will not necessarily give you the same results if the machines in question handle/respond to these types of packets differently. ---Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message