From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 15 20:13:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1791106568B; Sat, 15 Aug 2009 20:13:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jasonh@DataIX.net) Received: from www6.pairlite.com (www6.pairlite.com [64.130.10.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79BD48FC4D; Sat, 15 Aug 2009 20:13:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dataix.net (unknown [99.190.82.75]) by www6.pairlite.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD729B828; Sat, 15 Aug 2009 16:13:43 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 16:13:42 -0400 From: "Jason J. Hellenthal" To: Doug Barton Message-Id: <20090815161342.28932adc.jasonh@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: <4A871560.70202@FreeBSD.org> References: <4A86FF1E.1030705@quip.cz> <6B5B7698-CCD8-48FF-A5FB-0349D4CC1143@exscape.org> <20090815154851.be2ac5a7.jasonh@DataIX.net> <4A871560.70202@FreeBSD.org> Organization: DataIX X-Mailer: DataIX Hobbyist Systems X-OpenPGP-Key-Id: 0x691411AC X-OpenPGP-Key-Fingerprint: 6F56 3B10 D8AD 1D33 96E7 5946 E3B6 2768 6914 11AC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, Thomas Backman Subject: Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jasonh@DataIX.net List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 20:13:44 -0000 On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:06:56 -0700 Doug Barton wrote: > Jason J. Hellenthal wrote: > > > Why not just add weekly_status_pkg_enable="YES" to /etc/periodic.conf.local and youll be informed of packages that need updating. > > Sorry to pick on your response, but this thread is a good time to > remind people of some basic mailing list etiquette: No its not a problem at all I must have missed part of the thread and picked up the portion where pkg_version was being discussed. > > 1. Read the whole thread before you reply (the suggestion you made > above was already made earlier in this thread). > > 2. Make sure you understand the real problem before you reply (the OP > has some sort of problem with his INDEX and ports tree not matching, > we've moved past just finding out what needs updating). > > 3. Don't speculate. If you're not 100% sure about something let > someone who is more knowledgeable reply. There have been several posts > in this thread that gave misleading and/or confusing information that > could easily have been avoided. > > > hth, > > Doug > > -- > > This .signature sanitized for your protection > -- Jason J. Hellenthal +1.616.403.8065 jasonh@DataIX.net