From owner-freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 2 13:28:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D6CF106566C for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:28:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from packages@amiga-hardware.com) Received: from mirkwood.electric-dreams.org (mirkwood.electric-dreams.org [IPv6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:fe93:1cd]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B167F8FC12 for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:28:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nyx.homenet.lan (124-169-239-244.dyn.iinet.net.au [124.169.239.244]) (authenticated bits=0) by mirkwood.electric-dreams.org (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q32DS5R7020466 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:28:08 GMT Message-ID: <4F79A964.2070501@amiga-hardware.com> Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 21:28:04 +0800 From: Ian Chapman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org References: <4F798459.4000301@amiga-hardware.com> <20120402131132.78578915@zeta.dino.sk> In-Reply-To: <20120402131132.78578915@zeta.dino.sk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mirkwood.electric-dreams.org Subject: Re: Newbie - Mac G5 Dual PPC 970 @ 2Ghz X-BeenThere: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the PowerPC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 13:28:11 -0000 On 04/02/2012 07:11 PM, Milan Obuch wrote: >> and it appears and feels much faster now. I was wondering if these >> debugging options are on for a reason or whether it was an oversight? > > I think this could be an oversight... those are option for debugging > using mostly in -CURRENT, so probably they should be taken out in > 9-STABLE... We are already after 9.0 RELEASE. Ah that's good, I'm less worried about something exploding because I removed them :-) >> Anyway the real stumbling block is getting X to work. I did see a >> similar issue in the archives but wondered if anyone at resolve it. >> My graphics card is as follows: >> >> vgapci0@pci0:0:16:0: class=0x030000 card=0x41521002 >> chip=0x41521002 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 >> vendor = 'ATI Technologies Inc' > Can't help much here - I did not yet reach that far. It would be > interesting to see your full dmesg output somewhere, at least for > comparing hardware. Sure, no problem. Here's full the dmesg output after a clean boot http://pastebin.com/ZsyFe7nw -- Ian Chapman.