From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 14 08:03:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD7337B401 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 08:03:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.xciv.org (vantage.xciv.org [217.158.13.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 861B443FCB for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 08:02:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from paul@xciv.org) Received: from 82-43-155-50.cable.ubr03.newm.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.43.155.50] helo=gw.home.xciv.org) by mailhost.xciv.org with esmtp id 19c4qX-000LBb-00; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 16:02:33 +0100 Received: from tuscan.xciv.org ([172.27.5.20]) by gw.home.xciv.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19c4li-0000R7-00; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:57:34 +0100 Received: (from paul@localhost) by tuscan.xciv.org (8.11.6/8.11.6/XCIVnbsdncV1) id h6EF1cS00772; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 16:01:38 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 16:01:38 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <200307141501.h6EF1cS00772@tuscan.xciv.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: knews 1.0b.1 Organization: iso.org.dod.internet References: <13297.1057943729@xciv.org> <3F12C335.3060004@tenebras.com> In-Reply-To: <3F12C335.3060004@tenebras.com> From: paul@xciv.org (Paul Civati) X-Original-Newsgroups: xciv.lists.freebsd.stable To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: paul@xciv.org Subject: Re: Where did kernfs go? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:03:01 -0000 In article <3F12C335.3060004@tenebras.com>, kudzu@tenebras.com (Michael Sierchio) writes: >> [kernfs] was removed because it served no discernible purpose and was >> highly suspect from a security standpoint. What do you need it for? Well, I don't *need* it, as all the info provided from there can now probably be had through sysctl, I was just puzzled that it had vanished without any notification or mention. > The problem is obviously that many people were taken by surprise. Quite. I'm sure there may be scripts around (rightly or wrongly) that reference /kern. -Paul-