From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Feb 5 14:40:16 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (rwcrmhc53.attbi.com [204.127.198.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E09437B419; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 14:40:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8]) by rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020205224008.YFRY10199.rwcrmhc53.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 22:40:08 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA87480; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 14:36:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 14:36:57 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Daniel Eischen Cc: Matthew Dillon , Dan Eischen , bde@FreeBSD.ORG, peter@FreeBSD.ORG, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: getsetcontext system call In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > > > I thought we were trying to avoid having to make any system calls on > > > > a userland thread context switch. > > > > > > In the threads library, we'll use our own library routines to > > > do this (hopefully) without having to make a system call. > > > > Or maybe use kernel entries that are already hapenning anyway..... > > Huh? > I was thinking that when saving thread context back to userland after completing a syscall but before going on to another syscall, we can save lots of FP state etc as well. Maybe I'm confused on the topic of conversation. > -- > Dan Eischen > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message