From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 21 09:17:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55FCE16A4CE; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:17:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from faceman.servitor.co.uk (faceman.servitor.co.uk [80.71.15.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9469043D2D; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:17:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wiggy@servitor.co.uk) Received: from wiggy by faceman.servitor.co.uk with local (Exim 4.30) id 1BcKv3-0003mu-8X; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:16:49 +0100 Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:16:49 +0100 From: Paul Robinson To: David Malone Message-ID: <20040621091649.GA92422@iconoplex.co.uk> References: <20040621054406.GA927@VARK.homeunix.com> <200406210910.aa18808@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200406210910.aa18808@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Sender: Paul Robinson cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: David Schultz cc: Scott Mitchell cc: Dimitry Andric Subject: Re: /bin/ls sorting bug? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:17:02 -0000 Guys, Hate to be the party-pooper, but this thread is starting to smell a bit odd. The smell reminds me of something... when I was a kid at school... during the break.... ahh, that's it. This thing smells like a bikeshed. :-) For what it's worth the original patch looked good to me. The nanosecond patch is fine too. Please, no more intimate discussion of a command line flag that few people use, and if it doesn't work correctly now could have been worked around with a pipe to sort. I'm guessing the messed up order was because the files that were out of kilter were the files being hard-linked to but don't have the time to check. So in some ways, the output was predictable. Either way, I say commit or let it die... no... more... ls... :-) -- Paul Robinson http://www.iconoplex.co.uk/