Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 2 Jun 2003 17:48:23 -0700
From:      Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@internetcds.com>
To:        Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Vinum performance
Message-ID:  <20030603004823.GA78992@backmaster.cdsnet.net>
In-Reply-To: <20030530101845.GG40976@wantadilla.lemis.com>
References:  <3ED72156.1070905@intersonic.se> <20030530101845.GG40976@wantadilla.lemis.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hmmm, I thought the consensus was to use a weird stripe size to avoid
getting all the inode/superblock stuff on 1 disk.

I seem to recall somebody saying somethingabout using stripe sizes
like 273k and such...

On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 07:48:45PM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Friday, 30 May 2003 at 11:16:06 +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> > Using Vinum on 4.7-RELEASE-p10, I wonder what can be done to optimize
> > performance. So far I am not impressed but perhaps I did not configure
> > Vinum optimal, grateful for any hints thanks.
> 
> You haven't said what your problem is.  It definitely depends on your
> application (which may simply be the way you measure it).
> 
> FWIW, the stripe size should be a multiple of the file system block
> size.  Yes, the man pages don't necessarily say that, but it's also
> not so important.
> 
> Greg
> --
> When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients.
> If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients.
> For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html
> See complete headers for address and phone numbers




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030603004823.GA78992>