Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 22:24:02 +1100 From: Sam Lawrance <lawrance@FreeBSD.org> To: Andrew Pantyukhin <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, "Vanilla I. Shu" <vanilla@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/sdl_sge Makefile Message-ID: <34A30D0C-348E-4C13-9D88-111501BF2380@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <cb5206420611260231p330755adtd354dd2397a94e2f@mail.gmail.com> References: <200611260309.kAQ39isH084947@repoman.freebsd.org> <cb5206420611260231p330755adtd354dd2397a94e2f@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 26/11/2006, at 9:31 PM, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 11/26/06, Vanilla I. Shu <vanilla@freebsd.org> wrote: >> vanilla 2006-11-26 03:09:43 UTC >> >> FreeBSD ports repository >> >> Modified files: >> devel/sdl_sge Makefile >> Log: >> Move devel/sge to devel/sdl_sge. > > It is a good idea to request an update to VuXML before > moving a vulnerable port. It wasn't vulnerable, the vuxml entry was intended for sysutils/sge and sge53. Anyway, does moving a port really require a vuxml update? I thought it checked by package name rather than origin.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?34A30D0C-348E-4C13-9D88-111501BF2380>