From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 28 20:10:50 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBD716A4CE
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 20:10:50 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A996143D2F
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 20:10:49 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from peadar.edwards@gmail.com)
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so482227wri
        for <arch@freebsd.org>; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:10:49 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
	s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
	b=R/MZ3JHek6ka8EIJV8kKK3ARygXiTyMfN/1Sx+mJXE6H7/rsWtnjKmkykoYiF2MIVHobFIDsEFc49l5tSCGfhTboNWI14K96AyhgEBbQ/1b6HqEldZ5aMGYeW28/S07ZVuTmiPRGbI+xWvCBPYfwScJb5UNFDqO7VIyGRh+9lq0=
Received: by 10.54.28.75 with SMTP id b75mr59164wrb;
        Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:10:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.57.76 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:10:49 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <34cb7c84050128121077633d22@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 20:10:49 +0000
From: Peter Edwards <peadar.edwards@gmail.com>
To: Paul Richards <paul@originative.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20050128173327.GI61409@myrddin.originative.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <20050128173327.GI61409@myrddin.originative.co.uk>
cc: arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: c99/c++ localised variable definition
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Peter Edwards <peadar.edwards@gmail.com>
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 20:10:50 -0000

> Personally, I find the c++/perl convention to be much less error prone
> and more intuitive and since c99 now supports it too it seems the
> standards body sees the benefits of this approach as well.

I also, personally, like using this particular feature when writing
userland code.  However, in terms of kernel stuff, there's a practical
reason for grouping definitions of local variables together: you can
have a much better idea of how much stack space you are using when
introducing a new definition when all other definitions are nearby.
i.e., although a pleasing feature in terms of writing clean code in
algorithmically, it can be quite a danger when dealing with a very
limited stack.