Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 05:37:51 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 219767] [NEW PORT] devel/python-dateutil: Extensions to the standard Python datetime module Message-ID: <bug-219767-13-Hgj8HWSGCE@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-219767-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-219767-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D219767 Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD. |matthew@FreeBSD.org |org | Resolution|FIXED |Rejected CC| |python@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #3 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- Assign to committer that resolved and use correct(er) resolution (FIXED mea= ns change made/committed). This is a good example of why Python ports must be named exactly after their upstream counterparts, ugly (py, python-) prefixes/suffixes and all.=20 Renaming py-dateutil has been on the todo list for a while but given the nu= mber of existing dependencies has taken a backseat. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-219767-13-Hgj8HWSGCE>