From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 2 15:57:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2437F106566C; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 15:57:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F538FC0C; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 15:57:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.63] (63.imp.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.63]) (authenticated bits=0) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p32FsGmv054175 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 2 Apr 2011 09:54:19 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <4d96d545.e/wWTIUATgk2CGjt%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 09:54:16 -0600 Message-Id: References: <4D95E162.40605@FreeBSD.org> <4D95ECDE.1020504@FreeBSD.org> <4d96d545.e/wWTIUATgk2CGjt%perryh@pluto.rain.com> To: perryh@pluto.rain.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (harmony.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.6]); Sat, 02 Apr 2011 09:54:19 -0600 (MDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com, avg@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: looking for error codes X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 15:57:53 -0000 On Apr 2, 2011, at 1:50 AM, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: >=20 >> With respect to my knowledge , no one of the operating systems >> has a facility to separate read-only and modifiable parts ... >=20 > SunOS 4 had a partial solution to this, by rearranging the FS layout > so that /usr could be mounted read-only (and often, from a server -- > IIRC a single /usr could be shared among multiple diskless clients). > They used quite a few symlinks so that things could be found in > their accustomed places although actually located elsewhere. The > scheme was fairly well described in the SunOS 4 manual set; granted > _finding_ a SunOS 4 manual set these days may be a challenge :) FreeBSD can do this too. In fact, NanoBSD relies heavily on having most = of the system mounted read-only, and has MFS partitions for /etc and = /var. Warner