Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 00:18:40 +0200 From: "clemensF" <ino-waiting@gmx.net> To: Marius Bendiksen <mbendiks@eunet.no> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c Message-ID: <20000625001840.A1017@spotteswoode.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10006242301540.94193-100000@login-1.eunet.no>; from mbendiks@eunet.no on Sat, Jun 24, 2000 at 11:05:02PM %2B0200 References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10006242301540.94193-100000@login-1.eunet.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Marius Bendiksen: > the various quota routines, rather than a (struct proc *). As I can see > >from the code, chkdq(), for example, should rather be using an suser() > check upon a process structure, than testing cred->cr_uid==0. Are there > any objections to changing this? this should be more portable and future-save, right? clemens To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000625001840.A1017>