From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Oct  8  9: 9:36 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE6A1589F
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  8 Oct 1999 09:09:28 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com)
Received: (from dillon@localhost)
	by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id JAA03108;
	Fri, 8 Oct 1999 09:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dillon)
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1999 09:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Message-Id: <199910081609.JAA03108@apollo.backplane.com>
To: Andrzej Bialecki <abial@webgiro.com>
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Non-standard FFS parameters
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9910080912200.54250-100000@freja.webgiro.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

:> 
:>     Adjusting the bytes-per-inode (-i) specification in newfs should not 
:>     pose a problem.
:
:IOW now you say it's ok to use very high values of -i... ;-) 
:
:Andrzej Bialecki

    No, I didn't say that.  My recommended maximum is still 262144.  Fsck 
    should be reasonably fast with that number and the filesystem should 
    still be able to maintain reasonable efficiency.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message