From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 00:33:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA6716A4CE for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 00:33:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cyclone.mail.adnap.net.au (cyclone.mail.adnap.net.au [203.6.132.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D90C43D2D for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 00:33:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bastill@adam.com.au) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (unknown [202.6.152.187]) by cyclone.mail.adnap.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2DED99481; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 11:06:02 +1030 (CST) From: Brian Astill To: buga@auug.org.au, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 11:06:50 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200412071106.50575.bastill@adam.com.au> Subject: Installing FBSD 5.3 and 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 00:33:39 -0000 I guess there is some small incompatibility between my system and FBSD. Whatever .. the effect was that as I kept CVSupdating from FBSD 4.7 through 4.10 I gradually lost usability as first one program then another, failed. I decided to wait for 5.3 before using FBSD again. In the meantime I have been running Knoppix 3.4 with complete success,though it will have its own HUGE upgrade problems in due course. I MUCH prefer FBSD and its way of doing things, anyway. So ... I've waited for FBSD 5.3, have purchased the Release 4-disk set and have 50G diskspace available. Maybe it would be better to split that 50G in half, install 5.3 in the first 25G, leaving the second free for 5.4 release. Later I would install 5.5 release in that first partition, then 5.6 release in the second, and so on. Question 1. Is this plan sensible and/or practical? Question 2. If the answer to (1.) is "No", what alternative would you suggest? Thanks for your (anticipated) helpful advice. -- Regards, Brian sos-sa.org.au