From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct  2 08:46:01 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C217B85C
 for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Thu,  2 Oct 2014 08:46:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD5FDE6
 for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Thu,  2 Oct 2014 08:46:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua
 [212.40.38.100])
 by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id LAA26448;
 Thu, 02 Oct 2014 11:45:58 +0300 (EEST)
 (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
 by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD))
 id 1XZc1N-000OvV-QR; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 11:45:57 +0300
Message-ID: <542D108D.80603@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 11:45:01 +0300
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net>
Subject: Re: Encrypted (GELI) root on ZFS troubles
References: <542C71C9.1050907@denninger.net>
 <d4f3fecfcd8785c41e3658ff34123088@dweimer.net>
 <542CD992.7050509@denninger.net>
In-Reply-To: <542CD992.7050509@denninger.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 08:46:01 -0000

On 02/10/2014 07:50, Karl Denninger wrote:
> 1. Having the kernel able to cross pools and examine the bootfs property
> would be fairly useful.

I don't understand your suggestion.  Every pool has bootfs property (if it's not
explicitly set then that means that it just has its default value).  So which of
the bootfs properties must be honored and why?  At present we honor bootfs of
the "current" pool, which is the only distinguished pool.

-- 
Andriy Gapon