From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 12 23:22:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E953416A41F for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 23:22:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arundel@h3c.de) Received: from enterprise4.noxa.de (enterprise.noxa.de [212.60.197.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2204D43D48 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 23:22:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arundel@h3c.de) Received: (qmail 3011 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2005 01:22:49 +0200 Received: from p508fe702.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO localhost.skatecity) (80.143.231.2) by enterprise.noxa.de with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 13 Aug 2005 01:22:49 +0200 Received: from localhost.skatecity (nobody@localhost.skatecity [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.skatecity (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7CNMraV046989 for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 01:22:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from arundel@localhost.skatecity) Received: (from arundel@localhost) by localhost.skatecity (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j7CNMrq8046986 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 01:22:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from arundel) From: alexander Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 01:22:53 +0200 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050812232253.GA42088@skatecity> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <20050809133109.GA15300@skatecity> <20050809192530.GA19230@skatecity> <20050810130928.GA2027@skatecity> <200508102019.15147.Danovitsch@Vitsch.net> <20050811120108.GA20415@skatecity> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050811120108.GA20415@skatecity> Subject: Re: Using sysarch specific syscalls in assembly? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 23:22:52 -0000 On Thu Aug 11 05, alexander wrote: > > Hmm...very odd. Should I file a bug report about this problem? Alright. I submitted a PR and got a suggestion on how to solve the problem by Bruce Evans. Could somebody (apart from me) try out his workaround and see if it works? Thx a bunch.