From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 31 23:23:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB9316A4DD; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:23:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pittgoth.com (ns1.pittgoth.com [216.38.206.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF5943D46; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:23:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (net-ix.gw.ai.net [205.134.160.6] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7VNNPq4055396 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:23:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:23:15 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: Helge Oldach Message-Id: <20060831192315.0412e836.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200608311258.OAA23536@galaxy.hbg.de.ao-srv.com> References: <44F6D3B2.5080903@inse.ru> <200608311258.OAA23536@galaxy.hbg.de.ao-srv.com> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: rik@inse.ru, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, babkin@users.sourceforge.net, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, ru@FreeBSD.org, gad@FreeBSD.org, des@des.no Subject: Re: "Chatty" config files in /etc X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:23:39 -0000 On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:58:38 +0200 (MET DST) Helge Oldach wrote: > Roman Kurakin: > >I suggest to make these files the way which would encourage peoples to keep > >example part, for example, under working part. Example will be still in the > >file, it will not bother admin, cause it do not cover essential part of > >the file, > >and will simplify merging. > > So, with the benefit of easing merging for committers, we end up with > two separate files for the end users (and sysadmins) - one "example > file" and one "tru config file". IMHO this sounds like complicating > matters. > > IMHO this whole problem and the discussion about it is a bit overkill. > Why not just keep it as it is? What is so fundamentally broken with the > current situation that we need important, POLA-breaking fixes? I think you missed the point completely. Please go back and re-read the discussion. -- Tom Rhodes