From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 1 09:32:18 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3041D16A46B; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 09:32:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from falcon.cybervisiontech.com (falcon.cybervisiontech.com [217.20.163.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD91B13C4A6; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 09:32:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.cybervisiontech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2A8744007; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 11:31:44 +0200 (EET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at falcon.cybervisiontech.com Received: from falcon.cybervisiontech.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (falcon.cybervisiontech.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UzRX8orDLg2d; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 11:31:44 +0200 (EET) Received: from [10.2.1.87] (gateway.cybervisiontech.com.ua [88.81.251.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by falcon.cybervisiontech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07A9C744005; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 11:31:43 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <47299CFE.6010309@icyb.net.ua> Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 11:31:42 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070803) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: gjournal for 6.X and fsck X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 09:32:18 -0000 It seems that gjournal patch for 6.X doesn't include the changes to make fsck aware of gjounral that were added to CURRENT code. Is it possible to produce a patch with such changes ? I would appreciate even a patch as it was applied to current, I think it will be very easy to massage it for 6.X. It's just that unlike svn (or many other source control systems) it is very hard to extract a "change set" to multiple files from CVS. Thank you! P.S. Just thought up of another nice-to-have thing: it seems that the 6.X patch has the earlier approach with .deleted directory, which was later improved. It would be nice to get a patch for this as well. And now I think that the two things are probably quite related. -- Andriy Gapon