From owner-freebsd-questions Wed May 21 07:05:15 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA11480 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 21 May 1997 07:05:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (buffnet4.buffnet.net [205.246.19.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA11448; Wed, 21 May 1997 07:05:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from buffnet11.buffnet.net (shovey@buffnet11.buffnet.net [205.246.19.55]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA00500; Wed, 21 May 1997 10:05:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 10:05:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Steve To: spork cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: named on two nets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I believe if named is invoked after the ifconfig alias, it binds to them all - I have this problem with my apache servers - so im pretty sure thats what it does. On Tue, 20 May 1997, spork wrote: > Hi, > > I have two machines (both nameservers) that are currently on two networks > from two providers. One interface is configured as an alias. > > I'd like to have the same named processes answering on both IPs, but that > doesn't seem possible. Anyone got any ideas how to do this on one > machine? I can't even find a way to specify a bind-address on the command > line... > > Charles > >