Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 19:22:55 -0700 From: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 64 bit times revisited.. Message-ID: <200110270222.f9R2Mtv06821@mass.dis.org> In-Reply-To: Message from Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> of "27 Oct 2001 03:49:15 %2B0200." <xzpwv1hq2ck.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org> writes: > > > :These programs should *not* be trying to use these functions. These functions > > > :are meant for manipulating time_t, which is a representation of "now". > > > > > > Who says? > > This is the definition of time_t. > > Chapter and verse, please. Not just a repetition of what somebody > else says may or may not be in C90. I'm not pointing to any standard; I'm pointing to the fundamental assumptions that underly the use and implementation of the seconds-from-epoch model. You're off the topic here though. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200110270222.f9R2Mtv06821>