Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 11:57:37 -0800 From: Sean Bruno <seanbru@yahoo-inc.com> To: Alan Cox <alc@rice.edu> Cc: "xen@freebsd.org" <xen@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PV i386 patch Message-ID: <1324411057.12783.8.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <4EF0D8D7.2060503@rice.edu> References: <4EEB9CCE.6090701@rice.edu> <1324169806.3093.3.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <4EED4982.3080208@freebsd.org> <1324339762.3093.14.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <4EF04F3C.9010309@rice.edu> <1324387685.3093.28.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <4EF0D8D7.2060503@rice.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 10:49 -0800, Alan Cox wrote: > On 12/20/2011 07:28, Sean Bruno wrote: > >> The code that panics shouldn't even exist in the Xen pmap. Try the > >> attached patch. > >> > >> Alan > >> > > Indeed .... how on earth did we ever use this stuff? :-) > > > > Tested to 2G on ref9-xen32.f.o .... should I go any higher? > > Sure. Right now, I don't know of any reason that it should crash with > more memory. :-) > > Do either of you know if there is a PR in gnats for this 768 MB > limitation bug that I should mention in the commit log? > > Alan > No, I just checked and I didn't put a PR in ... lame. I think I discussed it with colin or kip, but I don't remember if we ever figured out anything else. Sean
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1324411057.12783.8.camel>