From owner-freebsd-current Thu Feb 18 12:43: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D5B11289; Thu, 18 Feb 1999 12:42:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com) by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 10DaG6-000ARK-00; Thu, 18 Feb 1999 22:41:18 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Julian Elischer Cc: Doug Rabson , Bruce Evans , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: axp kernel breakage In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 18 Feb 1999 11:54:01 PST." Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 22:41:17 +0200 Message-ID: <40133.919370477@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 18 Feb 1999 11:54:01 PST, Julian Elischer wrote: > huh? can you expand on this... Um, sure. When my kernel build broke, I tried removing the option NFS_NOSERVER. This allowed me to build a kernel. After the problem in nfs_syscalls.c was repaired today (maybe last night), I put the option NFS_NOSERVER back into my kernel config and rebuilt the kernel. I now have two files that make me think that including NFS_NOSERVER dropped my kernel file size by 100KB: -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1385750 Feb 18 15:40 /kernel -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1494920 Feb 17 11:57 /kernel.old The box in question is used _only_ as an NFS client and the kind of environmental change that would demand NFS server capabilities would merit a reboot. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message