From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 6 20:45:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5110D106566B for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 20:45:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itetcu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (worf.ds9.tecnik93.com [81.196.207.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014558FC14 for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 20:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (it.buh.tecnik93.com [81.196.204.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 080AA22C508C; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 22:45:06 +0200 (EET) Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 22:45:04 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Message-ID: <20100206224504.697dc717@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <4B6DCBA2.5030202@quip.cz> References: <1781265383542@webmail54.yandex.ru> <20100206004206.5b87b5ee@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <01qv37-4ho2.ln1@news.hansenet.de> <4B6D3D80.5000400@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4B6DCBA2.5030202@quip.cz> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4 (GTK+ 2.18.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/eAUxXU.8I4MPGHPWQvT7KlI"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recent massive port update. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 20:45:07 -0000 --Sig_/eAUxXU.8I4MPGHPWQvT7KlI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:05:54 +0100 Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> wrote: > Matthew Seaman wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 06/02/2010 09:40, Heino Tiedemann wrote: > > > >> Shouldn't there be an entry in UPDATING, that "jpeg" has to be > >> rebuildet first? > >> > >> I rebuilded everything - but i have no idea about the order aof > >> port reinstalling. > > > > Actually that's not necessary in this case entirely because the > > commit was so large. Every port that needs to be rebuilt because > > it depends on libjpeg has had it's PORTREVISION bumped. That means > > that if you just do a 'portupgrade -a' or 'portmaster -a' the right > > thing will happen automatically. >=20 >=20 > No metter if there is revision bump or not, it should be in UPDATING > as it was in case of jpeg-7. >=20 > 20090719: > AFFECTS: users of graphics/jpeg > AUTHOR: dinoex@FreeBSD.org >=20 > The IJG jpeg library has been updated to version 7.0. Please > rebuild all ports that depend on it. No need, since it a port has a new version, a rebuild is expected. --=20 IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B --Sig_/eAUxXU.8I4MPGHPWQvT7KlI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAktt1NEACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeViFQCgrEsO/6OcjK3K/3JZaqxGFsVf k5IAmgMZsd5+tKiReakEtT9cAjlw/oal =NRiv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/eAUxXU.8I4MPGHPWQvT7KlI--