From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 20:03:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACDB106564A for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:03:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8992A8FC08 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:03:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghrr20 with SMTP id r20so1633482ghr.13 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:03:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=fmOV14gR/YKkRGfHSdghcG0qPYituD/lslmXU78Lcv8=; b=dzgcdTiimKK731qvXNhuphp0tsI/xMhnYBMxrEa9dOMI2zyuCM3aF9G+8UcVE3RjWC 6eLb6Ri/6twtUrWMLr5cZ4xaQuB3b+wLv/8jyO32xY9Pa/OlCSiFvoue7Mqpddtxg7iV UJ5Ifu1VPN+wDPaACAmPdas2audjLPK2dwZHvI5gYs/9Du2Y+/PccoEpl0wrjHcjPMcg 8SXUlo9RW3xUY6gKIeeWYMRTdu3OiLEVFZ1D1AWUFoB+KZyI3wrK6815h+fG/nm+3KOy aXhZTGQ60gOFWN98fP0sdaBfDhWfydSakYmzkEVg6F5MJN13rf/pqBgUzPgT4IRFgREK Yw/w== Received: by 10.101.180.40 with SMTP id h40mr1050923anp.4.1334260980266; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:03:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o15sm12096994anj.1.2012.04.12.13.02.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:02:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3VTChx16Ydz2CG44 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:02:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:02:56 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120412160256.0feac5cf@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4F869CD2.2040702@onetel.com> References: <4F863615.80203@shatow.net> <4F864EEE.4010508@p6m7g8.com> <4F869CD2.2040702@onetel.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEUAAABYRlwJCw4FAgAIBwKprDkBAQFQLR0BAgCir7VRttp8AAACAUlEQVQ4jZWUTYvbMBCGTVl8V2hX6Gg5G5FbWQdBj0lEfE7BhN4cyzi5Wt1E5L70roWy6N92xok/skkP+5IYrMcz78xIduDWpNM3vFzuA/jX5EY1AI6KHFwW/CzFuQAwqUBbV12p+CzIh6Awq7sg33pn5D64SQXAexffeuQlA/L35RrkaB551OjGfP/cAO8mCNaDcgvfky5ijoD0pAXlCQCnljiAjsJD9Ax05Ko5sZxbnLQcmM+dZg5IjREfZrWIHK0JuwU68pAGwHvfRxBundRzTxxz3r9dNUikPsEihjz2Dc4kjp1hKsJGuot4EDxaxzMoC7XqhxhOSfZrTS6gSX1JVdjp+o1PvWfekXgw3WL0g70nDEwA0H0HQsEZc8sTmFMTkWUfYWC/vdR1zQy3xLQgLwzu90QnlnFLjeiGWBjwhb4Sa42IqOg2qqS4O1/zhKokFUb1Q8Rj4Eb69WVflXEehJ35DgChVTE5n50eaGyMLOfH8AOodoSM4PVYAQgQdBulOa+knklYks3vAuQ+uX492lTl+A+e8qBV2AKoXalVKFfyuUp0pUp1ARaUHh82lv9MN+Ig7CZtgE6FNYvjlywT2VP2dMgOG46gTIWcqdfvuwyXNz0oMJNd/N5lh1YNiJt19ADTUo3VuFSNeQwVqRSrGjSCp53fk2g+Mvfk/gfoPxHeUS8MH9vRAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlU0D3hc/tyyqTMe1j4xS+NCLZBu/sBVZDCOIOoJU0KCzmFR3StQG0oGQdjJsXPz4HBL4x6 Subject: Re: ports-mgmt/portupgrade - Deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:03:07 -0000 On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:13:54 +0100 Chris Whitehouse articulated: > I'm only a lurker and lowly user but could I humbly request that > portmanager is brought back into use? It's simple to use and does > what it does extremely well and without fuss. I think the fact that > it still "just works" after all this time is a mark of it's worth. I totally agree. While I do use "portupgrade" from time to time, "portmanager" seems to fix problems that "portupgrade" can't and that "portmaster" just makes worse. Plus, "portmanager" is much faster than "portmaster" Then again, that is just my 2¢. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________