From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Apr 14 1:56:40 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from fox.uni-trier.de (fox.uni-trier.de [136.199.8.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAEE114E59 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 1999 01:56:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from blank@fox.uni-trier.de) Received: (from blank@localhost) by fox.uni-trier.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA53363; Wed, 14 Apr 1999 10:53:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 10:53:09 +0200 From: Sascha Blank To: Rick Knebel Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Accelerated X 5.0 Message-ID: <19990414105309.A52095@fox.uni-trier.de> References: <19990413171115.A25045@rknebel.uplink.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: <19990413171115.A25045@rknebel.uplink.net>; from Rick Knebel on Tue, Apr 13, 1999 at 05:11:15PM -0400 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 26 FD 71 B5 48 12 42 91 10 1C 4F 74 70 48 6F 89 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello Rick, On Tue, Apr 13, 1999 at 05:11:15PM -0400, Rick Knebel wrote: > I have a copy of Accelerated X 5.0 and was wondering if anyone is using > this in freebsd 3.1. I'm running AX 5.0 now for a few weeks on my 3.1-STABLE box at home, and so far there haven't been any problems at all. > XFree seems to work okay but I was just going to try it to improve my > performance in X. I have a Matrox Mystique 220 card and the performance improvement that AX 5.0 gives me in comparison to XFree86 3.3.3.1 is very well visible. -- Sascha Blank | "I prefer to work behind the scenes. The Student and System Administrator | reward is nearly as great, and the risk at the University of Trier, Germany | is far far less" - Ambassador Mollari in mailto:blank@fox.uni-trier.de | in Babylon 5, "The coming of shadows" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message