From owner-freebsd-current Tue Nov 10 09:14:13 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA19117 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 09:14:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail1.its.rpi.edu (mail1.its.rpi.edu [128.113.100.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA19049 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 09:14:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.acs.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by mail1.its.rpi.edu (8.8.8/8.8.6) with ESMTP id MAA125308; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 12:14:09 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: drosih@pop1.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <199811101002.CAA01721@dingo.cdrom.com> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 12:13:18 -0500 To: Mike Smith , current@FreeBSD.ORG From: Garance A Drosihn Subject: Re: Simple NFS ACCESS caching, call for testers Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 2:02 AM -0800 11/10/98, Mike Smith wrote: > The attached patch adds a trivial cache for NFS ACCESS operations, > which may provide a moderate to substantial performance improvement > in some cases. > > If you have an NFS v3 server that you beat heavily on, I'd love to > know whether these changes make any difference to you. Are these meant for the server-side, or for the client side? Ie, would you want to see a test of someone installing this on a FreeBSD-based NFS server (which may in fact be serving files to machines running other OS's), or on FreeBSD clients? (or only if freebsd is the OS on both sides?) --- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.its.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or drosih@rpi.edu Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message