From owner-freebsd-net Sun Aug 12 2:51:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E16B37B40C for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 02:51:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from itojun@itojun.org) Received: from itojun.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by coconut.itojun.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED454B21; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 18:51:27 +0900 (JST) To: Julian Elischer , net@freebsd.org In-reply-to: itojun's message of Sun, 12 Aug 2001 18:40:02 +0900. <4246.997609202@itojun.org> X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2 Subject: Re: IPV6/KAME/protosw integration cleanup From: itojun@iijlab.net Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 18:51:27 +0900 Message-ID: <4382.997609887@itojun.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >>When KAME was added the mesh was less that perfect but there was so much to >>be done that some shortcuts needed to be taken. >> >>now that time has passed some of these can be cleaned up. >> >>1/ Merging ipprotosw.h and protosw.h >>2/ removal of all varargs stuff from the kernel >>(this revealing the mismatched prototypes they were hiding) >>removal of lotso warnings from the KAME stuff. > > the change does add pain to KAME integration side on upgrades. > note that KAME codebase uses the same code across multiple *BSDs. > please don't do this. also, IIRC, ipprotosw.h was added just for freebsd, as a result of some "code review" between shin@kame and other folks on freebsd mailig lists. some of you asked for it. itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message