From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 24 13:06:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE9116A4CE for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 13:06:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [207.154.84.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 707A943D48 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 13:06:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adamw@magnesium.net) Received: (qmail 67486 invoked by uid 1252); 24 Jan 2004 21:06:35 -0000 Date: 24 Jan 2004 16:06:35 -0500 Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 16:06:35 -0500 From: Adam Weinberger To: Jeremy Messenger Message-ID: <20040124210635.GH3365@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <1074887353.768.86.camel@gyros> <20040123201250.GK3365@toxic.magnesium.net> <1074889273.768.101.camel@gyros> <20040123202314.GN3365@toxic.magnesium.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Editor: Vim 6.2 http://www.vim.org X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5 http://www.mutt.org X-URL: http://www.vectors.cx X-ASL: 6/m/behind you User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users Subject: Re: HEADS UP: New gettext update X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 21:06:36 -0000 >> (01.24.2004 @ 1559 PST): Jeremy Messenger said, in 2.7K: << > On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:23:14 -0500, Adam Weinberger > wrote: > > >>>(01.23.2004 @ 1521 PST): Joe Marcus Clarke said, in 1.8K: << > >>On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 15:12, Adam Weinberger wrote: > >>> >> (01.23.2004 @ 1449 PST): Joe Marcus Clarke said, in 1.1K: << > >>What do you mean by, "stops cold?" I have no problem with backing this > >>out...but I like Mezz's suggestion, too. > >>>end of "Re: HEADS UP: New gettext update" from Joe Marcus Clarke << > > > >I mean nothing will build against it. > > Which part did it failed? Right now, I am building x11/gnome2 (2.5.x) and > so far it looks good compile w/ gettext 0.13. It's on the gnomepanel part > now, it will be around two to three hours to finish. I wrote a simple > shell script (attaching) to do the work edit all /usr/ports/*/*/Makefile > that has gettext in it. However, when the build is done and I do the test, > then I will let everybody know the result. >> end of "Re: HEADS UP: New gettext update" from Jeremy Messenger << I think the problem was caused by something else. I'm now logging my builds with 2>&1... dunno why I wasn't before. I have 2 more builds to test stuff before I try a gettext-0.13 one. It'll be a few days but I'll give it a better whirl. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adam@vectors.cx // adamw@FreeBSD.org // adamw@magnesium.net http://www.vectors.cx