From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jul 16 14:05:48 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA13766 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 16 Jul 1998 14:05:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from echonyc.com (echonyc.com [198.67.15.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA13753 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 1998 14:05:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from benedict@echonyc.com) Received: from localhost (benedict@localhost) by echonyc.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id RAA23273; Thu, 16 Jul 1998 17:05:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 17:05:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Snob Art Genre Reply-To: ben@rosengart.com To: "Scot W. Hetzel" cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Make release fails because kernel is too large In-Reply-To: <00df01bdb0f7$b88cfc60$c3e0d9cf@westbend.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 16 Jul 1998, Scot W. Hetzel wrote: > What about using 1.68 or 1.72 MB floppies? I think that this would drastically reduce the amount of FreeBSD-friendly hardware out there. Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message