From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 8 00:41:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A83AFB7 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 00:41:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Received: from mailhost.m5p.com (ip-2-1-0-2.r03.asbnva02.us.ce.gin.ntt.net [IPv6:2001:418:0:5000::16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41DB92216 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 00:41:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonderland.m5p.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mailhost.m5p.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r980fc4v062406 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 20:41:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Message-ID: <525354C2.8070807@m5p.com> Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 20:41:38 -0400 From: George Mitchell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base References: <20131007150658.GA79233@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <52534B5E.7010401@freebsd.org> <20131008002854.GB56872@funkthat.com> In-Reply-To: <20131008002854.GB56872@funkthat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73 on 10.100.0.3 X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (mailhost.m5p.com [IPv6:::1]); Mon, 07 Oct 2013 20:41:43 -0400 (EDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:41:45 -0000 On 10/07/13 20:28, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote this message on Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:01 +0800: >> not a big thing but I believe that a lot of poeple use ci/co on /etc >> becasue it is "just there" > > +1 > Folks, this is just plain a major violation of the Principle of Least Amazement. RCS is ideal for keeping track of my configuration files in /etc. What do we gain by removing it? Roughly 640 kilobytes of executable code and 60 kilobytes of compressed man pages. Had the community that hangs our on this mailing list heard about this when it could still have been described as a proposal, as opposed to a fait accompli, I would have described it as the epitome of a Half Baked Idea. -- George