From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Feb 21 19:50: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E5837B52B for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 19:50:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id TAA52438; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 19:50:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 19:50:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200002220350.TAA52438@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Will Andrews Subject: Re: ports/16899: Update net/wmnet port... Reply-To: Will Andrews Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/16899; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Will Andrews To: rneswold@enteract.com Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/16899: Update net/wmnet port... Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 22:44:07 -0500 On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 09:08:09PM -0600, rneswold@enteract.com wrote: > diff -ur wmnet/Makefile wmnet.new/Makefile > --- wmnet/Makefile Mon Aug 30 09:24:31 1999 > +++ wmnet.new/Makefile Mon Feb 21 00:22:00 2000 > @@ -1,16 +1,16 @@ > # New ports collection makefile for: wmnet > # Version required: 1.2 > # Date created: 24 November 1998 > -# Whom: Rich Neswold > +# Whom: Rich Neswold I think that for historical reasons, the original email address should be kept. But that's just my opinion.. :) -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message