Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:42:38 -0700
From:      Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com>
To:        paradox <ddkprog@yahoo.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: which "include" being used?
Message-ID:  <CAN6yY1tF92Sp2NS=Crr1wn7uvuuOeY%2B_j-eOOFPcMZ2ErxnQ9Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1316542838.11969.YahooMailClassic@web120526.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
References:  <1316542838.11969.YahooMailClassic@web120526.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:20 AM, paradox <ddkprog@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Why build the world uses /usr/include ?
> why not use "include" from the /obj/...include ?
>
> issue to "build world" with loss of multiple files at /usr/include/

Did your make "build world" or "buildworld"? It should be all one word
and it does use
the header files in /usr/obj/... or /usr/src/... At least for me, it
does. Failing to do so
would break a lot of things.

You should also look at the magic done by the .mk files. This does
make some of the
header files look like they were pulled from /usr/includes because of
the things the .mk
files do to your environment.
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer - Retired
E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN6yY1tF92Sp2NS=Crr1wn7uvuuOeY%2B_j-eOOFPcMZ2ErxnQ9Q>