From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 12 11:21:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F265716A4CE; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 11:21:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (newtrinity.zeist.de [217.24.217.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4411743D3F; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 11:21:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i3CILqOY048382; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:21:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by newtrinity.zeist.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i3CILlgh048381; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:21:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius) Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:21:47 +0200 From: Marius Strobl To: "Brian F. Feldman" Message-ID: <20040412202147.B93652@newtrinity.zeist.de> References: <200404121747.i3CHleLS055095@green.homeunix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200404121747.i3CHleLS055095@green.homeunix.org>; from green@freebsd.org on Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 01:47:40PM -0400 X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter 1.1-beta; AVE 6.25.0.2; VDF 6.25.0.10 (host: newtrinity.zeist.de) cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org cc: Alexander Leidinger cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/cdrtools-devel Makefile distinfo pkg-descr.mkisofs pkg-plist ports/sysutils/cdrtools-devel/files patch-ai patch-bb patch-cdda2wav::interface.c patch-cdda2wav::ioctl.c patch-cdda2wav::mycdrom.h patch-cdda2wav::setuid.c ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 18:21:54 -0000 On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 01:47:40PM -0400, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > > As to the quality being bad, did you submit the DVD-hack patches back to the > author? I don't think any of these things are really show-stoppers, just IIRC, I tried to contact him but didn't get an answer. > that it would be appropriate to make a non-slave-port that doesn't call > itself cdrecord or cdrecord-devel. I guess it depends on whether there are > users that would like to use this program on FreeBSD. Why in the world is Feel free to do so, I just don't want to have that DVD-patch(-option) in the cdrecord-devel port. Pav@ probably would be also interested in such a port. FYI, NetBSD has a "cdrtools-ossdvd" port, using yet another DVD-patch. > cdrecord-ProDVD binary-only, anyway? > Well, why is not all sofware open source and free as in beer?