From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Feb 6 12: 3:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (pcwin002.win.tue.nl [131.155.71.72]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24D837B401; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 12:03:18 -0800 (PST) Received: (from stijn@localhost) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f16K3C314927; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 21:03:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from stijn) Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 21:03:12 +0100 From: Stijn Hoop To: Ade Lovett Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apache mod_ ports Message-ID: <20010206210312.A12270@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <20010205180431.D17025@mail.vcnet.com> <14976.6091.425890.658134@onceler.kciLink.com> <20010206114010.I454@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010206114010.I454@FreeBSD.org>; from ade@freebsd.org on Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 11:40:10AM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 11:40:10AM -0600, Ade Lovett wrote: > I have here in my tree a www/apache which does just that, [more explanations skipped] > So, the technical work is pretty much done.. maybe another couple of > weeks to polish it all off. Sadly, the bikeshed that has already > started, many moons ago, with the complete brain-deadness of our > apache collection, means that it's unlikely to ever go into the > main tree. Can I just add a vote into going ahead with this plan? It may be a bikeshed, it may cause a bit of pain to upgrade for existing apache+ users, but it does clarify the apache ports *A LOT*. --Stijn -- What would this sentence be like if it weren't self-referential? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message