From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 17:21:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF7631065670 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:21:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA978FC0A for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:21:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 572E656172; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 11:21:18 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 11:21:18 -0600 From: Mark Linimon To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120122172118.GA10103@lonesome.com> References: <20120122054903.GB12469@lonesome.com> <4F1BF3BB.2000504@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F1C0BDD.7020205@herveybayaustralia.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F1C0BDD.7020205@herveybayaustralia.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:20:40 +0000 Cc: Mark Linimon Subject: Re: FreeBSD has serious problems with focus, longevity, and lifecycle X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:21:20 -0000 On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:15:09PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: > >Scroll up and count the serious and critical bugs too :) > I didn't realise it broke the numbers into the sections. Yeah. The problem is that, over time, the values in those fields has become meaningless. Some of us try to triage what should and should not be 'critical', but other than that, the whole concept has become useless. mcl