Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 11:21:18 -0600 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD has serious problems with focus, longevity, and lifecycle Message-ID: <20120122172118.GA10103@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <4F1C0BDD.7020205@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <iwnlzjkfomlarmtwnxdp@dbyr> <vouizjmsitytcxxslori@esas> <20120122054903.GB12469@lonesome.com> <4F1BF3BB.2000504@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <CADLo83_RqU8Aw-5Ynr9vWUPKB%2Bs7Ytgfib8iUnm4AO-cD9rcjw@mail.gmail.com> <4F1C0BDD.7020205@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:15:09PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: > >Scroll up and count the serious and critical bugs too :) > I didn't realise it broke the numbers into the sections. Yeah. The problem is that, over time, the values in those fields has become meaningless. Some of us try to triage what should and should not be 'critical', but other than that, the whole concept has become useless. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120122172118.GA10103>