From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Sep 9 10:03:58 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA20550 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 9 Sep 1997 10:03:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.210.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id KAA20535 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 1997 10:03:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tom by misery.sdf.com with smtp (Exim 1.62 #1) id 0x8Tci-0006vG-00; Tue, 9 Sep 1997 09:58:44 -0700 Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 09:58:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom To: Kenny Hanson cc: "'Josef Karthauser'" , "FreeBSD Hackers (E-mail)" Subject: RE: FTP compromise. In-Reply-To: <91DD7FDA88E4D011BED00000C0DD87E70BE975@pds-gateway.pdspc.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 9 Sep 1997, Kenny Hanson wrote: > I just successfully shot my cpu utilization up to 100% without any hopes > of seeing it come down. I had to kill the ftp process before the system > returned to a normal state. This is definitely D.O.S... anybody out > there > have any ideas on how to erradicate this? I ran this for 15 minutes > before Don't use wu-ftpd? The stock ftpd has lots of new features now, and can also have a builtin ls, which gives it a perf boost over wu-ftpd. Also, it doesn't say which version of wu-ftpd was used. I know there are new versions from academ. Tom