From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 28 09:58:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB09F1065670 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:58:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uffe@uffe.org) Received: from mail.starion.dk (mx0.starion.dk [83.95.112.88]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 387A88FC12 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:58:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12908 invoked by uid 528); 28 Apr 2010 09:31:54 -0000 Received: from 212.130.59.4 ([212.130.59.4]) by mail.starion.dk ([192.168.0.100]) with ESMTP via TCP; 28 Apr 2010 09:31:54 -0000 Message-ID: <4BD80074.80209@uffe.org> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 11:31:32 +0200 From: Uffe Jakobsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Trivial PR, fix shutdown of rc services started with onestart (fwd) X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:58:15 -0000 On 14/04/10 22.18, Doug Barton wrote: > > However there is a reasonable argument to be > made for having things work when the system is shut down. > > ... > > I'm not sure the patch in the PR is right (mostly for lack of > examination or testing), but I'm wondering what people think about the > general idea of having the shutdown action ignore whether _enable is on? > Sorry for my late response - I just returned from vacation. I'll vote for this change - this have been bugging me for some years now... /Uffe