From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 5 12:46:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F0A106566C for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 12:46:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglist@modernbiztonsag.org) Received: from mail.modernbiztonsag.org (mail.modernbiztonsag.org [212.52.166.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996EE8FC0A for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 12:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (5400CD90.dsl.pool.telekom.hu [84.0.205.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.modernbiztonsag.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0316515A011; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 13:26:56 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 13:26:56 +0100 From: Gabri Mate To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120205122656.GA9972@desktop.homelan> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: faxgetty 100% X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 12:46:31 -0000 On 12:07 Wed 01 Feb , mailinglist@modernbiztonsag.org wrote: > Dear List, > > i've upgraded a 8.2-STABLE system to 9.0-RELEASE, recompiled every package > and now faxgetty uses 100% CPU and cannot handle incoming connections > (under 8.2-STABLE everything was working OK). > > Sample output from ktrace: > > 64551 faxgetty 0.000003 RET read 0 > 64551 faxgetty 0.000004 CALL gettimeofday(0x7fffffffd9c0,0) > 64551 faxgetty 0.000003 RET gettimeofday 0 > 64551 faxgetty 0.000004 CALL gettimeofday(0x7fffffffd980,0) > 64551 faxgetty 0.000003 RET gettimeofday 0 > 64551 faxgetty 0.044500 CALL > select(0x8,0x7fffffffdb50,0x7fffffffdad0,0x7fffffffda50,0x69f340) > 64551 faxgetty 0.000010 RET select 1 > 64551 faxgetty 0.000009 CALL gettimeofday(0x7fffffffd980,0) > 64551 faxgetty 0.000004 RET gettimeofday 0 > 64551 faxgetty 0.000006 CALL read(0x4,0x7fffffffd1a0,0x7ff) > 64551 faxgetty 0.000015 GIO fd 4 read 0 bytes > "" > 64551 faxgetty 0.000005 RET read 0 > 64551 faxgetty 0.000005 CALL gettimeofday(0x7fffffffd9c0,0) > 64551 faxgetty 0.000004 RET gettimeofday 0 > 64551 faxgetty 0.000008 CALL gettimeofday(0x7fffffffd980,0) > 64551 faxgetty 0.000005 RET gettimeofday 0 > 64551 faxgetty 0.000004 CALL > select(0x8,0x7fffffffdb50,0x7fffffffdad0,0x7fffffffda50,0x69f340) > 64551 faxgetty 0.000006 RET select 1 > 64551 faxgetty 0.000009 CALL gettimeofday(0x7fffffffd980,0) > 64551 faxgetty 0.000005 RET gettimeofday 0 > 64551 faxgetty 0.000005 CALL read(0x4,0x7fffffffd1a0,0x7ff) > 64551 faxgetty 0.000004 GIO fd 4 read 0 bytes > > And kstat: > USER CMD PID FD MOUNT INUM MODE SZ|DV R/W > uucp faxgetty 64551 text /usr 1133532 -r-sr-xr-x 550432 r > uucp faxgetty 64551 wd /var 6571017 drwxr-xr-x 512 r > uucp faxgetty 64551 root / 2 drwxr-xr-x 16384 r > uucp faxgetty 64551 0 /dev 29 crw-rw-rw- null rw > uucp faxgetty 64551 1 /dev 29 crw-rw-rw- null rw > uucp faxgetty 64551 2 /dev 29 crw-rw-rw- null rw > uucp faxgetty 64551 3 /var 6571376 -rw-r--r-- 17 w > uucp faxgetty 64551 4 /var 6571373 prw------- 0 r > uucp faxgetty 64551 5 /var 6571039 prw------- 0 w > uucp faxgetty 64551 6* local dgram fffffe00acbef870 <-> > fffffe001029a5a0 > uucp faxgetty 64551 7 /dev 56 crw-rw-rw- cuau0 rw > > I'm at a loss here and don't know where to continue debugging this error. > Does anyone experiencing the same problem? > > Best regards, > Mate > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I've found a similar bugreport in the DragonFly BSD's issue tracker. http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/2028 http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/projects/dragonfly/repository/revisions/010f86dc1259be3b29303bfc336532138acd077d Best regards, Mate