From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jul 13 18:37:31 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5199C16A4DF
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 18:37:31 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from john@baldwin.cx)
Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net
	[66.23.211.162])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC1D43D49
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 18:37:30 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from john@baldwin.cx)
Received: from localhost.corp.yahoo.com (john@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k6DIbMLk099155;
	Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:37:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from john@baldwin.cx)
From: John Baldwin <john@baldwin.cx>
To: "Joao Barros" <joao.barros@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:18:15 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
References: <200607111451.22749.john@baldwin.cx>
	<70e8236f0607130819h155c8a46yc38eacb39378e30c@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <70e8236f0607130819h155c8a46yc38eacb39378e30c@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200607131418.16023.john@baldwin.cx>
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by
	milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [127.0.0.1]);
	Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:37:22 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1598/Thu Jul 13 07:38:16 2006 on
	server.baldwin.cx
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 
	autolearn=ham version=3.1.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on server.baldwin.cx
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 21:14:28 +0000
Cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] amr(4) testers needed...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 18:37:31 -0000

On Thursday 13 July 2006 11:19, Joao Barros wrote:
> On 7/11/06, John Baldwin <john@baldwin.cx> wrote:
> > I have a patch for amr(4) that is a forward-port of a Scott Long patch for 
4.x
> > that fixes some severe data corruption with amr(4) + PAE on 4.x with > 4GB 
of
> > RAM.  I need the patch tested on current though so I can get it into HEAD 
and
> > eventually into 4.x.  The patch for head is at
> > http://www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/amr_head.patch  It shouldn't break
> > anything and should basically be a nop.  I think the patch will apply to 
6.x
> > (and possibly 5.x) as well.  Thanks!
> >
> 
> I can test it on i386 without PAE. Is that test enough?

Yes, thanks!

-- 
John Baldwin