From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar 13 15:05:08 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF27B1065686
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:05:08 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B3D8FC1C
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:05:08 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n2DF0GUr008799;
	Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:00:17 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:00:38 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20090313.090038.-890725739.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: ed@80386.nl
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090313125115.GU31961@hoeg.nl>
References: <20090310.210746.1649765883.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<20090313125115.GU31961@hoeg.nl>
X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Final sanity pass: xdev
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:05:09 -0000

In message: <20090313125115.GU31961@hoeg.nl>
            Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> writes:
: Hi Warner,
: 
: The last couple of days/weeks I've been working a lot with LLVM+Clang.
: I'm currently writing some BSD makefiles to see how hard it is to add
: Clang to our base system, as a proof of concept.
: 
: A nice thing about Clang is that it seems to be very easy to compile in
: multiple backends into the same Clang binary. If we ever switch to Clang
: in the base system (who knows), it would be interesting to see whether
: it's useful to just compile in all backends by default.
: 
: Anyway, I took a quick look at the xdev patch and it looks okay. :-)

Woot!  Please let me know if it causes problems.

Warner