From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 18:41:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6AEA106564A for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 18:41:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alonsoschaich@fastmail.fm) Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F9E8FC08 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 18:41:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B0BC2C for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 14:41:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 05 Jun 2012 14:41:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= from:to:subject:date:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; s=mesmtp; bh=bqx6yoJxeNcuzW73Dayi0FVS984=; b=TrVBFLqN1witPla53vJdNmRvfKF2 ktvFLmxc8Q6PBpRwLm/ywtpUaO2U7jfwxn9dqZIADRi5cdoEAvpSwlJSTysL7P4w wtpYDmQ6V/TSpO22IGvIKdkEAVgEf3bKMa5BAMNSFAyOFt/wVdHp7BTbzoFHzvBd olLxe86skkw5g7E= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=from:to:subject:date:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id; s=smtpout; bh=bqx6yoJxeNcuzW73Dayi0FVS984=; b=DbpC/ lpSw269YGmGWiBkvlQLisKqFUCdjFkkOmeMMcoOvcwa1Mklsa4bLpNbcIwRJjxPJ Dsc65rALr7zgpNrSNuGtlXPtHV2qceVbaz0iHuRHK63mOMSE8+m/TslH0RO470aI muGA6WaHMa9U/mU37zoxubs/GPbQJSjqICbwi0= X-Sasl-enc: cmbofcazdMr57KbXxmBAOqdlgzP0wy1q0ZeQ4RWYX11N 1338921688 Received: from harmony.localnet.edu (unknown [141.87.213.55]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B51ED8E008E for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 14:41:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Schaich Alonso To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 20:41:19 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-STABLE; KDE/4.8.3; amd64; ; ) References: <4FCE37FC.1090405@gmail.com> <878874BA-2F5C-4A7E-8690-2A8A96536AE0@t-online.de> In-Reply-To: <878874BA-2F5C-4A7E-8690-2A8A96536AE0@t-online.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201206052041.19414.alonsoschaich@fastmail.fm> Subject: Re: em interfaces supermicro X9SCM-F board X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 18:41:35 -0000 On 2012-06-05 (Tuesday) 19:31:44 Sebastian Stach wrote: > I have an X9SCA-F board and recently updated the BIOS to version 2.0 (the > .508 BIOS file). Its not the same board as yours but maybe the you have > the same problem. When i downloaded the BIOS from the Supermicro website > on May 23 the included AMI.BAT only updated the BIOS and not the Intel ME > BIOS extension. > > When i downloaded the file again 2 days ago the AMI.BAT was updated to also > flash the Intel ME. Too bad the version number and the filename are still > the same. I only got to know this after contacting their support. > > My problems were different though. Both of my nics were usable but were > hanging after about 2 hours of heavy load but maybe your problem can be > fixed with a new BIOS update. > > Sebastian > Hello I never have updated the BIOS on my X9SCM-F, yet the interfaces are also going down after some time of full load. Was the NIC issue fixed for you by updating the BIOS? Alonso