From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 1 18:21:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABDD16A402 for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 18:21:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B539113C491 for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 18:21:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from oddity-e (oddity-e.topspin.kiev.ua [212.40.38.87]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id UAA17865; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:21:54 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 20:21:54 +0200 (EET) From: Andriy Gapon X-X-Sender: avg@oddity.topspin.kiev.ua To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, kde@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070201200505.I33603@oddity.topspin.kiev.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Subject: recent update of kdelibs3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 18:21:58 -0000 Guys, was there a real need to bump PORTREVISION of kdelibs3 port during a recent update ? I mean this is a quite "heavy" port and the change did not include any functionality change (no new/updated patch, etc). The change was purely infrastructural, so I think PORTREVISION bumping was not really necessery in view of the guidelines: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-naming.html#MAKEFILE-NAMING-REVEPOCH -- Andriy Gapon