From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 15:30:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 191AC16A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:30:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078AF43D31 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:30:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8NFUQex007975 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:30:26 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i8NFUQxS007967; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:30:26 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:30:26 GMT Message-Id: <200409231530.i8NFUQxS007967@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: bin/72006: floating point formating in non-C locales X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mikhail Teterin List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:30:27 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/72006; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mikhail Teterin To: Giorgos Keramidas Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/72006: floating point formating in non-C locales Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:28:18 -0400 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >On 2004-09-22 16:51, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > >>> en_US locale Greek locale >>> 1,000.00 1.000,00 >>> 2,000,000.00 2.000.000,00 >>> >>> >>These numbers are not parsable one way or the other -- the "thousand >>separators" are not, AFAIK, supported at all: >> >> printf: 2.000.011 >> printf: 2.000.011: not completely converted >> 2 >> >> > >True, but partial support already exists for producing these numbers >with the %'f format of printf: > >$ env | egrep -e 'LANG|LC_' >LC_ALL=en_US.ISO8859-1 >LANG=en_US >$ printf "%'.02f\n" 12345678 >12,345,678.00 > > Are we planning to ever _recognize_ such numbers? If not, we may as well recognize the dot always and the coma (or whatever) -- sometimes. Anyway, this is moot. We should be doing, what relevant RFCs/standards proscribe. I thought I saw somewhere, that the dot is supposed to be recognized, but I can't find a link now (everybody talks about implementations, rather than specifications). We need a judgment of some standards guru... Yours, -mi