From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Mon Feb 13 21:52:38 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82956CDE7F9 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 21:52:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F1CE62F for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 21:52:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v1DLqcDk035083 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 21:52:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 217022] [PATCH] To be using an uninitialized variable member of struct cpu_search at function cpu_search Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 21:52:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: avg@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 21:52:38 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D217022 --- Comment #3 from Andriy Gapon --- (In reply to hisamitu from comment #2) The code is not very readable, I admit that. But I think that there is no problem. Please note that in both cases cs_load is accessed after '||' operator. lload and hload are initialized with such values that the left-h= and side of the operator is going to be true when the condition is evaluated for the first time, so the right-hand side is not going to be evaluated. After that cs_load gets assigned and the next time the condition is evaluated the= re won't be any uninitialized values. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=