From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Aug 24 08:53:35 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AA47B16A4BF; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 08:53:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E4DBE43F75; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 08:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.8/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h7OFrYUK027706;
	Sun, 24 Aug 2003 11:53:34 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 11:53:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
X-Sender: eischen@pcnet5.pcnet.com
To: Soren Schmidt <sos@spider.deepcore.dk>
In-Reply-To: <200308241543.h7OFhnR1083528@spider.deepcore.dk>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10308241151310.27424-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: thomas@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: HEADS UP! ATAng committed
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: deischen@freebsd.org
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 15:53:35 -0000

On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Soren Schmidt wrote:

> It seems Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > > This is a case for Thomas I guess, atapicam is his baby I just allow it
> > > to be around :)
> > 
> > I appreciate all the work you've done for ATA.  But that said, atapicam
> > has been present for a while, and it should have been tested and made
> > to work -- at least so it doesn't panic the system -- before committing
> > ATAng.
> 
> And that is axactly the case, this is what I've got from Thomas and that
> should have been tested etc etc..

OK, I guess I missed that.  Sorry for the repeated response.

-- 
Dan Eischen