Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 18:57:33 +0000 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> Cc: leslie@eskk.nu, perryh@pluto.rain.com, Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Martin Matuska <mm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Stop in /usr/ports/multimedia/x264 Message-ID: <CADLo83-ZbMcRmi-KqCzPXDzQMfjb-jpS%2BU49amNr92h1nt5wfg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4EF374E1.6050206@yandex.ru> References: <4EF1E3EF.9000405@eskk.nu> <CAN6yY1tOrhyng1o5%2Bo5ko3cEoT2MLqCUF=L47Gesv%2BNnDdrhFw@mail.gmail.com> <4ef30e7b.gG6UGw%2BkkNWpdv07%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4EF2F920.8060007@FreeBSD.org> <CAN6yY1viu8vxkmOQQEUKk%2BvzM7vGJ8--tsw8hbYfCyBbPyYNpQ@mail.gmail.com> <4EF35F70.5070606@yandex.ru> <CADLo83_qrR6--=eV7EyCkq%2Bg%2B_Ew1u_YCCTRWV22zGWJj=uo4Q@mail.gmail.com> <4EF374E1.6050206@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22 Dec 2011 18:20, "Ruslan Mahmatkhanov" <cvs-src@yandex.ru> wrote: > > Chris Rees wrote on 22.12.2011 22:12: > > On 22 Dec 2011 16:49, "Ruslan Mahmatkhanov" <cvs-src@yandex.ru> wrote: > >> > >> Kevin Oberman wrote on 22.12.2011 20:38: > >>> The only thing I can think of is that the failing system is the > >>> oldest, running 8.2 while the others were running 9.0-RC2 and > >>> 9.0-Beta3. > >> > >> Yes, all is worked just fine (before the bash fix commit) there on > >> 10.0-CURRENT i386. I saw that configure warnings too, but it still was > >> built successfully. May be bash only needed on some older FreeBSD > >> versions like 8.2, that didn't had all that improvements for /bin/sh, > >> that were merged in 9 and 10, so maybe it is the reason why it builded > >> fine on this systems w/o any additional fixes. > >> > > > > True, since 9 sh supports == -- however I might label this compatibility > > shims, rather than 'improvements'... > > > > Chris > > I'm talking about overall /bin/sh work, not only about compatibility > with some `non-true' shells. I know many things was done and tests > coverage is terrific. > So may we imply dependency on shells/bash and specific configure patches > only if OSVERSION < 900000? > Trouble is with these problems is that they can hide, and don't always result in outright failure (i've experienced this with musicpd and Clamav). The scripts need a proper audit before being declared sh-safe. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83-ZbMcRmi-KqCzPXDzQMfjb-jpS%2BU49amNr92h1nt5wfg>