Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:31:18 -0700 From: James Long <list@museum.rain.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Brendan Grossman <brendan@grossman.id.au> Subject: RE: /boot at beginning of drive Message-ID: <20060417223118.GA26723@ns.museum.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <20060417005950.9B1CF16A422@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20060417005950.9B1CF16A422@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 06:21:55 +0930 > From: "Brendan Grossman" <brendan@grossman.id.au> > Subject: RE: /boot at beginning of drive > To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> > Message-ID: <20060416205147.6544228454@porsche.brendan.id.au> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > > > Where they use that quota is anyone's guess. > > > > > > > User's tempfiles will go to /usr/tmp. > > > > > > How does that work? I just checked /tmp, and it's not a symlink. > > > > Copy the contents of /tmp to /usr/tmp then remove /tmp and > > symlink /usr/tmp to /tmp. > > Yes, may I ask what the point is though? > > Here is my reason for separating /tmp and mounting it noexec,nosuid: > > http://www.sagonet.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2852 Please pardon my question out of ignorance, but isn't nosuid redundant when the part. is already noexec? When else does the setuid bit come into play except on executable files?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060417223118.GA26723>